With next version of Crystal Security, .NET Framework 4 is not required anymore.
.NET Framework 3.5 will be required for next version of Crystal Security.
With next version of Crystal Security, .NET Framework 4 is not required anymore.
.NET Framework 3.5 will be required for next version of Crystal Security.
* .NET Framework 4 is not required anymore (at least .NET 3.5 must be installed).
* Settings will be reverted to default.
* Shell integration bug reported by jenny66 will be investigated.
"Bezpieczeństwo jest podróżą, a nie celem samym w sobie - to nie jest problem, który można rozwiązać raz na zawsze" "Zaufanie nie stanowi kontroli, a nadzieja nie jest strategią"
It looks much better for meKardo...I hope it will be in next release
"Bezpieczeństwo jest podróżą, a nie celem samym w sobie - to nie jest problem, który można rozwiązać raz na zawsze" "Zaufanie nie stanowi kontroli, a nadzieja nie jest strategią"
Interface looks great. But, have you think about to add contrasted background in horizontal menu? These tabs are "general", "protection", "behavior" and "checkup". Here is screenshot with my suggestion:
Interface looks great. But, have you think about to add contrasted background in horizontal menu? These tabs are "general", "protection", "behavior" and "checkup". Here is screenshot with my suggestion:
We can see taht colour of alert depends of detection results but we have only two options (green/red) or maybe something between them?...and where is the border that give us red or green popup window?
"Bezpieczeństwo jest podróżą, a nie celem samym w sobie - to nie jest problem, który można rozwiązać raz na zawsze" "Zaufanie nie stanowi kontroli, a nadzieja nie jest strategią"
ichito napisał(a):We can see taht colour of alert depends of detection results but we have only two options (green/red) or maybe something between them?
Yeah, between "Clean" and "Malware" result - suspicious:
@Kardo
- I can''t see your screenshot
- my question is - to how high level of detection we still have green alert and from how low level we have already red alert?...and is there something like "not covered area" between them?
"Bezpieczeństwo jest podróżą, a nie celem samym w sobie - to nie jest problem, który można rozwiązać raz na zawsze" "Zaufanie nie stanowi kontroli, a nadzieja nie jest strategią"
ichito napisał(a):@Kardo
- I can''t see your screenshot
- my question is - to how high level of detection we still have green alert and from how low level we have already red alert?...and is there something like "not covered area" between them?
Hi,
You can see "Suspicious" notification through the following link: